It’s really frustrating, I was talking to someone about how successful China has been in de-radicalization of reactionaries. But they responded to this by saying they’re only successful because, and I quote “put them all in concentration camps and killed them”

Has anyone here been successful in deprogramming people about this topic? If so any good sources I can use to dissuade them? I tried telling them that the UN report, if you read it, just says that there’s concerns about abuse by internment offcials, and there’s no evidence of genocide. But when I say this they just dismiss it as if the UN is controlled by the PRC. It’s like a religion to liberals to believe anything bad about China and can get really frustrating.

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    yes. those are uyghurs fighting the government, and many of them were killed i.e. martyrs. terrorist is just a political designation, many ‘terrorists’ can represent positive forces so simply arguing that being designated terrorist invalidates the ETIM is going to fall flat if you support or defend groups the US/Israel calls terrorist.

    which is why US/NATO designations of uyghur terror groups as terrorists is an important factor

    • loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can’t say for sure that you are wrong. But the western consciousness does not acknowledge these terror attacks.

      The last one happened in 2014 and the process of setting up reeducation centres happened after that, which is the foundation of the claims of genocide. Plus the terror attacks were terrorism in the rawest sense, which makes it almost impossible to frame them as a genuine struggle.

      • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        the terror attacks were terrorism in the rawest sense, which makes it almost impossible to frame them as a genuine struggle

        if you can get into the details of specific acts, ideology, and background of these groups it indeed is hard to argue. all i’m saying is your initial argument should not be presented in a way that makes you look like a fool through the simple addition of context prior to 2014. no one died? these terrorists freedom fighters died