The Supreme Court ruled Biden’s student-loan forgiveness is illegal, meaning borrowers will resume payments without debt cancellation this year.

    • Anomandaris@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you know?

      For all we know that one person could have convinced another to vote in favour of debt relief. Or perhaps when it became clear the vote was standing 5-4 it would make one of those five decide it’s not clear enough and switch their vote because there wasn’t a strong enough majority to block the executive branch.

      Or perhaps if it was blocked at 5-4 it would give more options for result to be challenged or appealed.

      Lots of things might be different if politicians who say they are for the people actually act in the best interests of the people, even if that means they retire.

      • nameless_prole@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s not pretend that he conservative justices didn’t already know how they were going to rule on this. They just needed to do a little parallel construction before issuing their opinion.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        For all we know it could have spurred the conservatives to work even harder to screw over the country.

        Basing your entire ideology on “what could have been” is a fools errand. Its time to start looking at the future, instead of lamenting the past.

        Unless you find more fulfillment in bitching about how its everyone else’s fault your life is shit.

        • Anomandaris@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know why you’re taking that tone with me, I didn’t bitch or lament about anything nor make any statements about my “ideology”.

          All I did was point out “one seat wasn’t going to make a difference” is faulty logic.

    • claymedia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget about the other seat that the Rs blocked Obama from filling. The SC could have been a 5-4 dem majority.

      • LegendofDragoon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That whole situation still makes me so mad. That turtle bastard refused to even hold hearings for Merrick Garland for 9 months because it was an election year, and then four years later held hearings voted on and seated Barrett after the election had started.

        We should absolutely have a liberal 5-4 majority. Instead we live in a conservative 6-3 dystopia, with Republicans openly planning on denying any results they disagree with and installing whatever fucking president they want.

      • Ertebolle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still can, we just have to avoid giving Republicans a window of Senate + WH control in which to replace Alito or Thomas. (and even if we only get one of them we get another crack at it a few years later with Roberts)

          • Ertebolle@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thomas is 75, fat, and I assume he’s not doing daily yoga, abstaining from alcohol, and following a strict vegan diet on all of these rich-guy junkets he goes on. Alito is 73 and likewise. Pure evil can get you an awfully long way - c.f. Henry Kissinger - but even so, the odds of either of them lasting much more than another decade are pretty slim.