• Umbrias@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes I know that because it’s absurd. But here you and others are arguing that the article needs to be comprehensive.

    “I want to see studies on how substantial of an impact this has” is a reasonable critique.

    “The author didn’t address every possible contributing factor and so I’m going to ignore any possible thoughts the article presents immediately” not so much.

    “How mouse farts contribute to climate change” is a hilarious article idea. There are lots of fun directions it could go from serious discussion of how to analyze climate impact from different animals and industries to the mocking of green washing.