Google is embedding inaudible watermarks right into its AI generated music::Audio created using Google DeepMind’s AI Lyria model will be watermarked with SynthID to let people identify its AI-generated origins after the fact.

  • wildginger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not saying non organic thought isnt possible

    .

    I am not saying non organic thought isnt possible

    For fucks sake, quit making up shit I didnt say because you failed to find a gotcha against the things I say.

    Do you think the existence of calculators makes machine thought impossible? No? Then why would you make up that I think so?

    Chatgpt and its program families arent trying to be real AI. A salesman just wants you to think they are so you spend money on it.

    They are language calculators. They were built with the intent of being language calculators. Their creators all understand they are just language calculators.

    The handful of programmers who fell for the marketing, like that poor google idiot, all get fired. Why? Because their bosses now know that they dont understand the project.

    An equation cannot think. That doesnt mean a machine cant, ever. It means that a machine who thinks will not be an equation calculator.

    We can look at chatgpts code. We can see that it is only an equation. So long as it is only an equation, it isnt capable of thinking. Attempts at real AI may use some equations within the machine brain. But it cannot be a brain while the entire thing is only an equation.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Alright man, you gotta calm down.

      I didn’t read what you said because it started off abrasive and incorrect.

      Please, take a break and come back when you’ve cooled off. I can wait.

      • wildginger
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        How about you come back when you respond after reading?

        Dont waste my time with your anti science kookery that isnt even responding to the conversation. Thats the third time you failed to read what was given to you.

        • interceder270@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Alright, I asked nicely.

          On the ignore list you go. Learn how to conduct yourself if you want to be taken seriously.