edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting

feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOPEnglish
      141·
      11 months ago

      i think some people interpret “full of” differently and that’s a fair gripe to have with this post

      as i said in the body text, feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)