4·
3 days agoI still regularly listen to that soundtrack.
- 0 Posts
- 43 Comments
Joined 22 days ago
Cake day: April 12th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
14·3 days agoFurther back than Babylon. We’re talking ancient Sumer.
2·3 days agoBecause plastic is made primarily from petroleum and how else will Big Oil get a cut?
3·4 days agoIt already exists. Quite literally there’s an AI VC based largely on him: https://www.theblock.co/post/323192/marc-andreesen-shoutouts-help-ai-powered-vc-fund-ai16z-to-nearly-100-million-market-cap
Begun, the Balkanization of the US has.
3·4 days agoAlso a good option is a hard boiled egg that has been marinated in soy sauce.
There is a source in the upper-right. The source is Al Jazeera.
You are multiple years too late on vagina candles: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/jan/13/why-is-gwyneth-paltrow-selling-a-candle-that-smells-like-her-vagina-goop
1·7 days agoIt would have happened regardless. The cost of production has increased while the price of the product itself has ostensibly gone down. Like I said, adjusted for inflation, Chrono Trigger would have cost roughly $170 USD. Yes, the cost of cartridge production was relatively expensive, but that’s only a portion of the overall production cost for the game. At its peak, that dev team only had like 200 developers, and that was only during part of the development. Compare that to something like an Assassin’s Creed title that has 2-3x that sized team for most of the life of development.
With the costs of development increasing and the cost of the game itself remaining stagnant, it was only a matter of time. People wonder what happened to all the middleware games that existed in the 90s and early 00s. This is why they died out. Companies can’t afford to take risks on titles because of ballooning production costs, so they stick to churning out recognizable IPs. tbh, they should have raised the prices a long time ago.
Games were standardized to $60 back around 2005. Prior to that, games were just whatever the price that publishers decided the game should be. Chrono Trigger cost $80 USD at launch in 1995: https://fantasyanime.com/squaresoft/ctabout.htm Adjusting for inflation, that would be just shy of $170 USD now. It was not uncommon for games for the Nintendo 64 to retail for $70-80: https://retrovolve.com/n64-games-were-ridiculously-expensive-when-they-first-came-out/
Video games (particularly console and handheld games) have always been an expensive hobby. Games also haven’t been adjusted for inflation in the 20 years since prices were largely standardized, which is why they have become a microtransaction hell.
Honestly, this will likely lead the the return of video game demos. Because video games were prohibitively expensive in the 80s and 90s, demos were a huge part of the culture so that you could try them out ahead of time to get a feel for if they were worth the price tag.
Considering that the Pentagon keeps talking about UAPs primarily coming from the ocean moreso than space, this seems likely to be a short-lived venture.
Generally speaking, people used ChatGPT back when it first came out, had a bad experience and never fucked with it again, so their understanding of it is frozen in time. Most people know next to nothing about the current state of AI unless you’re a researcher or enthusiast. They’re completely unprepared for the actual state of the industry.
I value you for your commitment to DEI, Chief O’Brien. I’m sure Keiko approves as well.
Age of Pisces Yeshua fish. ♓ 🐟
That’s not fair. It’s not the whole family. Mara Wilson is great.
When I say “how can you be sure you’re not fancy auto-complete”, I’m not talking about being an LLM or even simulation hypothesis. I’m saying that the way that LLMs are structured for their neural networks is functionally similar to our own nervous system (with some changes made specifically for transformer models to make them less susceptible to prompt injection attacks). What I mean is that how do you know that the weights in your own nervous system aren’t causing any given stimuli to always produce a specific response based on the most weighted pathways in your own nervous system? That’s how auto-complete works. It’s just predicting the most statistically probable responses based on the input after being filtered through the neural network. In our case it’s sensory data instead of a text prompt, but the mechanics remain the same.
And how do we know whether or not the LLM is having an experience or not? Again, this is the “hard problem of consciousness”. There’s no way to quantify consciousness, and it’s only ever experienced subjectively. We don’t know the mechanics of how consciousness fundamentally works (or at least, if we do, it’s likely still classified). Basically what I’m saying is that this is a new field and it’s still the wild west. Most of these LLMs are still black boxes that we only barely are starting to understand how they work, just like we barely are starting to understand our own neurology and consciousness.
What do you mean? I don’t follow how the two are related. What does being fancy auto-complete have anything to do with having an experience?
If you think asylums aren’t for incarceration, you’ve clearly never been to one.