• meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel the same when celebrities use their “platform” to generate donations for a cause. It’s like you made $100m on your last movie, gave $50k and got the other $1.5m from just regular people.

    Yet most are like “yes but good still happened” and I’m like yes but by that logic, I could take 90% of your paycheck and say, “yes well you still made 10% which is way better than nothing!”

    Moreover, who gets all the credit and publicity? Yup, the celebrity. Not Joan Lam from MI who gave $50 and makes $45k a year.

    • Sprokes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I also think that some celebrities charges their appearance so they get paid when participating because they bring more donations.

      • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Absolutely. Most non profits take a huge cut of donations so only a fraction make it to those that need help. UNICEF is always under fire and at one time, they estimated that like only 10% would make it to the needy. Every UNICEF tv spot, ad or spread in a magazine is paid for by donations. So is all the staff their hire. And they actually pay really well. Again, all taken from the donations.

        Most charities are just a business that doesn’t pay taxes and the execs all have cushy jobs.

    • Aedis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      but by that logic, I could take 90% of your paycheck and say, “yes well you still made 10% which is way better than nothing!”

      That’s already happening :)