• birdberry_babka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Authoritarian communists. Think Stalinists, and people who support regimes like the CCP. The top left of the political compass.

    • scifu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does the word Tankie comes from the tanks in tinnamen square?

      • falsem@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The term “tankie” was originally used by dissident Marxist–Leninists to describe members of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) who followed the party line of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Specifically, it was used to distinguish party members who spoke out in defense of the Soviet use of tanks to crush the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the 1968 Prague Spring uprising, or who more broadly adhered to pro-Soviet positions.[5][6]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

    • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except Russia and China aren’t even pretending ti be communist.

      Russia is a christo fascist oligarchy.

      And China is a corporatist authoritarian state.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This doesn’t stop tankies from being pro-Russia and pro-China. Modern tankies are absolutely happy with oligarchies and gigacorporations running the world, they just hate western society.

        In essence, they worship authoritarianism rather than communism itself.

        I’d say the difference between a tankie and a socialist is that a socialist wants equality and well-being for everyone and tankies just want people they don’t like to die at the hands of an authoritarian regime, regardless of whether it’s actually a communist regime.

  • fiasco@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I’m saying that, when a communist does it, it’s not an atrocity.”

    If we wanted to mess up scansion for the sake of correctness, “when someone who calls themselves a communist.”

    • UnderNull@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Authoritarian Communists. Not all communists are tankies.

      Remember kids, Authoritarianism is bad, no matter which side you wield the stick for.

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Communist philosophy has a lot of really useful analytical tools. It describes and criticizes society, especially capitalist society, in a very sharp and insightful way. People should read and learn it because it’s interesting, useful stuff that is easily applied to modern politics.

    Communist philosophy also calls for a (typically violent) revolution involving an authoritarian transition to get rid of capitalist society and usher in the future collective state. When a violent revolution is being called for in (mostly) functional democracies, that should usher in some skepticism from a normal, reasonable person.

    The tankies reallllllly seem to like the violence, though, and are extremely supportive of any state that claims to be communist regardless of what atrocities that state commits along the way. They will be intensely defensive against any criticism (criticisms like “maybe Stalin shouldn’t have starved millions of people to death through incompetence and genocidal inclinations”, “maybe Mao shouldn’t have wiped out all the doctors and artists”, “maybe Putin shouldn’t be allowed to try and annex Ukraine”, etc.).

    At some point, it becomes hard to properly separate these supposedly “authoritarian left” types from the “authoritarian right” fascists. Political compasses are stupid anyway.