• Maple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really surprised tbh, Steam has pushed this thing like crazy. Good for them though. They made a great product that filled a big gap in the gaming industry and pushed others to follow. We’ll see a lot of innovations in this space similar to cell phones. I’m excited by the idea that in 10-15 years I’ll have a portable computer in my pocket with the same capabilities as my home machine. The future is bright.

  • open_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not personally in the market for a Steam Deck, but I am still incredibly grateful to Valve for all the work they’ve done to support Linux on the desktop as a byproduct.

    • portalsentinel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To be fair, even if it was $, most Steam Decks costs around (or less) than one tenth of a triple A game’s price. Selling hardware in this quantity is insanity.

      Edit: 10 times. Not one tenth. Oops. I meant that they need to sell less than 1/10th in VOLUME to match the sum of a triple A game. And selling that much hardware is really impressive in my opinion.

        • portalsentinel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          OMFG I MEANT 10X THE PRICE, NOT ONE TENTH. sorry for the confusion 😅

          The message was that the deck has to sell less than 1/10th as many “units” as a triple A game to match the price sum. So imagine hardware selling 1/10th that of a single software. Pretty impressive.