• EndOfLine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m confused.

      Can you explain what “orphan crushing machine” means and how allowing a woman to terminate a non-viable that was threatening the life and her future fertility would contribute to it?

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 months ago

        To save a click

        Orphan-Crushing Machine is a metaphor for “heartwarming” news stories about someone remedying the immediate effects of a sociopolitical issue that ignore the root cause of said issue. The catchphrase and metaphor satirize these stories by comparing them to a story of a person raising money to keep 200 orphans from being crushed where nobody questions why an orphan-crushing machine exists in the first place.

      • whodatdair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I took it as “It’s depressing that the legal system was involved in this. It’s not uplifting that the judge is making decisions about whether she’s allowed to get a medical procedure.”

      • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Copy paste from my other follow-up comment, since the meaning of the phrase was already linked.

        Did you read the article? What is happening is horrific and is still eligible for the state to attempt an overturn or a delay. The whole scenario is disgusting.

        I’m glad she got this win, but nothing about what is happening and why it’s happening is uplifting.

    • toasteecup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      So wait.

      Killing a mortally wounded animal is a mercy kill, but killing a unhealthy baby that will die anyway is “an orphan crushing machine”?

      Are you actually advocating for that child to suffer and die anyway?

        • toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ahhh new to me meme, appreciate the info. Glad I wasn’t reading what I thought I was cause good lord I’ve had my faith in other people tested too much today

      • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Did you read the article? What is happening is horrific and is still eligible for the state to attempt an overturn or a delay. The whole scenario is disgusting.

        I’m glad she got this win, but nothing about what is happening and why it’s happening is uplifting.

        Also, Jesus bud. You assumed I’m not only against abortion but pro suffered birth and yet, somehow hypocritical because I’m pro animal euthanasia from my comment? Lol how?

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        No. They are saying that it is fucking pathetic that a judge was required to allow it to happen. Like if they’re is news that someone raised $100k on GoFundMe for necessary surgery: it’s nuts that that was even required to happen.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 months ago

    I understand why you’d call this uplifting news if you were local, but to the rest of us it’s like “USA briefly pauses grinding own face under own boot”.

  • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    7 months ago

    Poor sodding woman, having to go through all that just to be allowed to try to live. Good for her, looks like she might get that chance soon. So much stuff though!

    It’s odd, Americans all make a big fuss about freedom, and about Texas being the place with the most freedom, yet they seem to have a lot of freedom prevention…

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Americans all make a big fuss about freedom, and about Texas being the place with the most freedom,

      Texans are probably the only ones making some claim to high levels of freedom exclusive to Texas, not Americans in general.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      The sensible among us know that the freedom banter is a bunch of lip service. While we do have much more freedom that than many other places on this planet, the powers that be would love to implement neofeudalism.

  • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Courageous of her to hold her ground insisting it gets done in Texas rather than taking the easier way, going to a nearby state to have the procedure done. Courageous of her because pregnancy/abortion is a delicate matter of time, you can’t wait too far into the pregnancy to get an abortion. This made a powerful political statement because it put pressure on the judicial system to come to the right decision and do it quickly.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    To somebody in the USA this might sound uplifting given how bad things are there as a baseline in healthcare and women’s rights, but to us Europeans this situation just sounds horrifically dystopian and deeply saddening :-(

  • Delusional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The judge should not be able to have any fucking say in that. Dumbass texas.

    • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep. Medical emergencies should be decided by trained medical staff. Not really all that uplifting, hey?