• Graphine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, with Apple making it incredibly fucking hard to take out their batteries with excessive amounts of glue, I’m okay with this.

      • Graphine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They do, but they’re incredibly prone to breaking when you pull and sometimes they’re just hard as shit to grip so you have to use a screwdriver to twist and pull.

        I don’t think I need to explain why that’s so dangerous.

        • JCreazy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As someone who has changed hundreds of iphone batteries, the adhesive sucks. At least they changed to a different adhesive around iphone 8 because alcohol does wonders on it. I don’t even attempt to pull the tabs on those anymore.

          • Graphine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            May I ask how you do that? Do you just…douse the battery in alcohol? There isn’t much of a gap between the adhesive and the battery in my experience, so it just sits inside the chasis and rolls around. I haven’t had any luck with that but I’m probably doing it wrong.

            • JCreazy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I drizzle some in the corner and then use a sturdy tool to gently pry up on the battery to allow the alcohol to get deeper under. Since the adhesive patches are small to fit around the wireless charging coil, it doesn’t take much. Once you get one side of the battery loose the other will easily come with it, especially if the alcohol got to them.

  • got2best@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do y’all remember the days when you dropped your phone and it exploded into 3 or 4 pieces? 🤣 Those were the good days.

    • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Three. Battery, cover and the rest. Weirdly, no damage to the plastic display. How? I guess it was the weather bezel

      • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And when you scratched up the back you bought a new one for $12. No $200 glass or machined aluminum cases that we put $35 covers on just to protect them from every day use.

  • quortez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fingers crossed that this will be implemented well, im tired of having sleek electronics be irrelevant in 2 years when the silicon could go for 5 or six

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The silicon could go on for decades if both the modem and processor were fully documented hardware that the community can access and support in the Linux kernel.

      I can run a secure and current form of Linux on 30+ year old hardware if I want to, because the hardware documentation was expected by everyone at the time even if some end users were oblivious to what this meant. The whole reason google pushes Android is because they provide a base Linux kernel that hardware manufacturers can easily slip their proprietary junk into without requiring them to add the kind of open source code needed for mainline kernel support by the community. This is the mechanism that depreciates your device. It is totally artificial and an end user exploitation by design.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s usually not silicon on the PCB that fails, but the other electronic components (usually the capacitors) that fails first, and since they are surface mounted devices it’s really difficult to solder them by hand.

        • j4k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are no electrolytics in phones, and most newer phones don’t even have tantalums. So long as there are no flexing stresses induced, which is nearly impossible with the way phones are constructed now, the all MLC capacitors construction has the potential to outlast any PC motherboard or laptop by a large margin.

          The most critical issue is board connectors and moisture ingress. The USB-C connector or any other high pin density micro sized connector with a tiny pin pitch, and large electrical potential will fail from charge cycling and a resistance forming between pins. USB-C is particularly bad because reversing the connector doubles the number of pins on the board in a ridiculous amount of space. Just using a standard USB-C connector when ordering a prototype to be fabed at any common board house will double the price. The USB-C pin pitch is too tight for the most common fab process resolution.

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Phones are getting more expensive so people are holding on to them longer, so it’s a nice quality of life improvement to remove the barriers to battery replacement so less people have to go down to a phone repair store to get it changed. The more of a hassle battery replacement is seen the more likely people are to just upgrade and create e-waste.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem here is that in order for most people to be able to replace the battery themselves safely they need to be really idiot proof. We’d need to return to back covers with latches or big screws and batteries in cases and contacts. This shit is bulky, heavy and hardly waterproof.

      New iPhones use lipo pouch with a ZIF connector straight to the motherboard with a “pull to release” adhesive strip hidden under a panel with a single use sticky seal and two small screws. There is no black magic in replacing the battery yourself and the solution is small, lightweight and waterproof. However most people wouldn’t even know which way to turn the screws to loosen them and probably wouldn’t be bothered by throwing the phone away and getting the one with a better camera AI and more emojis.

      • Nogami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        [edit: deleted, echo chamber here. Android good, Apple bad. Moving on and blocking this community, can’t have a reasonable conversation, just like reddit I guess].

        • jorge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference is that most of the people isn’t expected to own a mechanical watch, but having a smartphone is pretty much expected. You cannot treat a basic commodity as if it were a luxury item.

  • guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Excellent! Batteries in modern phones are surprisingly definitely removable and replaceable. I’ve done it multiple times. However, the unfriendly barrier to entry is glue and clips that require careful prying with spugers. It’s quite clear manufacturers are happy blocking you getting in; plenty people just buy new phones when the battery gets too old.

  • Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hooray! Younger generations will finally be able to experience the joy of dropping their phone and having to pick up three to four different pieces! /s

    (I’m all for this change, by the way)

  • C8H10N4O2@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I might be in the minority here, but I feel this is actually a step back.

    In the 5 years I’ve had my phone, there have been two times I’ve ever really needed to pull the battery, and still the hard reset sequence still eventually worked in both cases.

    Anyone remember how some phones had issues with the battery door becoming somewhat loose over time, causing any slight bump to turn the phone off? Many have already commented on how they explode into multiple pieces when dropped. Traditionally the battery covers are incredibly flimsy plastic, even on flagship devices (cough Samsung). Waterproofing is a common concern too, however it actually can be done with a removable battery (e.g. Galaxy S5).

    What really needed to be addressed here was how cumbersome it is to get into these devices to replace the battery, and how often people are price gouged to replace them. I believe this could have been better written to allow for either a removable battery, or a standardized and affordable built-in battery replacement process.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t wait to hear the Apple marketing word for this feature. They’ll add some gimmick like the battery is held in with magnets and say “We call it MagPack and we think you’re going to love it.”

  • hyorvenn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fairphone 3 user here. My main reason to choose this phone a few years ago was because the battery could easily be replaced. Too many phones are perfectly functional but the battery is half dead. Another boon of non-glued batteries : You can carry two (or more) batteries to easily switch when the first one is KO. Meaning no need for portable charger and useless cables in your pocket. Phone at 10% ? Just change it, bam 100% in a second. Easy as that.

    I’ll probably not be the target of such regulations because I wouldn’t choose an anti-consumer phone brand anyway, but at least it’s going in the right direction.

  • boo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do miss being able to swap out a phone battery and this will certainly be a step in the right direction in terms ewaste and device longevity.

    One thing that I wonder about is waterproofing or water resistance. Some phones are basically waterproof in shallow water. How achievable is this with a device with a trivial way to remove the battery?

  • WinUnMax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Holy. 👍

    I wonder how thick phones will be because of this, what about phones with dual-cell battery? I know some of them do this for faster charging speed.

    • Relisui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely nothing will change You can already swap the battery very easily, once you win the fight with the glue. Granted, most of the recent phones now allows removing said glue more or less easily, too. The only problem i can see are the IP ratings, as the backplate would need to be swappable

      • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think the IP ratings are gonna be that much worse.

        The galaxy s5 had IP67 with a removable battery back in 2014.

  • konalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually love all these regulations on smartphones (mainly by the EU), like the recent USB-C standard. That one in particular makes it so much easier to share chargers around the house!

    • designated_fridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      USB-type C to become EU’s common charger by end of 2024

      I mean… Sure, but we’ve had USB-C as de facto standard for many years now. When was the last time you saw a micro USB phone?

  • ClassyDave@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wonder if phone manufacturers will fragment their offerings to satisfy EU requirements or if we’ll all end up with removable batteries.

    • moridinbg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will be a pretty major redesign of the chasis and body to accommodate a removable battery and the cover, so I think it would make little economical sense to maintain two designs for every phone sold here.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it doesn’t. you have have IP68 and a removable battery. What’s not as easy it making them paper-thin as the battery needs to have structural integrity of its own.

    • JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never understood the whole waterproof thing. I’ve never been in an instance where my phone was in any danger of getting wet. I get float trips and stuff but that seems like an uncommon case and even then there are ways to waterproof a phone temporarily.

      • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think a phone needs to be 100% waterproof to 50 metres, but some amount of water-resistance is just good product design. Companies should not be encouraging people to dunk their phones in water, I think IP ratings sadly encourage this as well as some of the advertising around their water resistance claims.

        But having some amount of water resistance built into electronics helps reduce e-waste because accidents do happen. For more serious water activities people should be buying waterproof bags for their electronics.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t use your phone on the bathroom or the kitchen? It never rains where you live? You never keep your phone in your pocket next to a sweaty leg?

        I want a phone that can survive minor issues. I don’t want a phone that will die because it slipped into the sink while washing my hands or something like that. A degree of being waterproof does that.

    • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My old Galaxy S5 was water resistant (IP67, 30min/1 metre submerged)

      The rear cover had a gasket to prevent water entering the motherboard, micro sd, battery, sim etc.