• mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Homie said nothing about eating them, just that he’d make them, which is a lot less weird.

    So let me just say directly I’d make Popsicles out of her discharge and slurp those things to the stick 😋😋

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait… How is making popsicles out of her discharge and not eating them less weird? Just casually keeping discharge popsicles in your freezer is definitely weirder than some weirdo eating it.

  • Chais@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And then those degenerates wonder why women avoid them like the plague. Probably thought that was a compliment, too.

    • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure it’s just a troll. By my estimation, people who act like that online are actually just unfunny normies and/or 13 year old kids. Degenerate is a bit harsh.

        • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not normalizing anything. I’m reacting proportionally. Typing some dumb bullshit on the internet for attention (and finding success, I might add) is not the same as doing it IRL. It’s cringe, it’s obnoxious, but it’s not really “dangerous” per se.

          If you remember the internet 10 years ago you’ll remember that saying weird shit to women online was completely normalized to the point where it didn’t even register as an issue for most people. We’ve come so far in correcting that by 1) making the internet more inclusive by way of accessibility, and 2) having the type of discussion that can actually change people’s minds and provide new perspectives, i.e. realistic discussion where we react proportionally.

      • Chais@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it though? There’s no way to tell if it’s supposed to be funny or something, in written communication, so there’s no choice but to take it literally.
        And it’s really just gross and distasteful and if they think it’s funny they should probably get their head checked.

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s no way to tell if it’s supposed to be funny or something, in written communication, so there’s no choice but to take it literally.

          The absurdity of it points to a joke, IMO. Dirty, off-putting and likely contrary to the conversation going on in the rest of the post it was left on, which may even be further hinting at a type of humor intended by the user (IE trolling).

          • Chais@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Indicates toward”, yes. But nothing more. On the flipside there absolutely are individuals that actually mean these things when they say them. Take the incels as an example.
            Apart from never understanding the appeal of “haha look, they all hate me because I said something stupid” I’d quote 4chan:

            Any community that gets its laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe that they’re in good company.

        • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s called giving the benefit of the doubt, do it for your own sanity. Is it gross and distasteful? Yes. Is the poster a mentally ill and a threat to themself or others? Probably not.