The detector can sense as a few as seven to 35 coronavirus particles per liter of air — about as sensitive as a PCR test but much quicker.

  • Shambling Shapes@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool. And now that it exists, they will be increasingly quick to adapt it to the next pandemic. There are other coronaviruses out there.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      These will never get deployed because the cost of COVID is a shared cost between too many parties and none of them will benefit from, and therefore buy, these devices.

      We need strict air quality regulations to make developments like these plausible for real world use.

      • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I imagine it’s worth it in healthcare contexts, but depending on cost it might be worth it for businesses too. If you run the risk of severe disruptions to critical services, the argument for installing these in your building isn’t hard to make.

  • WadeTurtle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something like this would really disrupt my company’s “I need you in the office every day” policy.