The nuclear scientists were killed using a special weapon whose details were barred from publication, Channel 12 says.

The 10th nuclear scientist was killed shortly after the other nine, as part of the overnight Thursday-Friday Israeli operation, which included strikes on Iran’s ballistic missile program and the Natanz nuclear site, along with the elimination of top members of the Islamic Republic’s military leadership, the network says.

The nuclear scientists were all killed while they were sleeping in their beds, with Israel deciding to carry out the assassinations simultaneously so that there wouldn’t be time to tip off those being targeted.

The scientists apparently believed they were safe from such targeting in their homes, a senior Israeli official tells Channel 12, noting that previously assassinated nuclear scientists were killed while heading to their cars after work.

Israel had been tracking Iranian nuclear scientists for years and the ten killed last week were marked for assassination in November of last year, Channel 12 says.

Just when I feel like dystopian news can’t really disturb me anymore…

Leaving this totally unrelated article about Palantir and Israel here for absolutely no reason at all…

How Israel Uses AI in Gaza—And What It Might Mean for the Future of Warfare:

A program known as “The Gospel” generates suggestions for buildings and structures militants may be operating in. “Lavender” is programmed to identify suspected members of Hamas and other armed groups for assassination, from commanders all the way down to foot soldiers. “Where’s Daddy?” reportedly follows their movements by tracking their phones in order to target them—often to their homes, where their presence is regarded as confirmation of their identity. The air strike that follows might kill everyone in the target’s family, if not everyone in the apartment building.

Abraham, whose report relies on conversations with six Israeli intelligence officers with first-hand experience in Gaza operations after Oct. 7, quoted targeting officers as saying they found themselves deferring to the Lavender program, despite knowing that it produces incorrect targeting suggestions in roughly 10% of cases.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    28 days ago

    I have always been amazed that countries are allowed to get away with this. You would expect that a country that does this would have their leadership rounded up by an international strike force instantly and hauled to Hague.

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      There is no “international authority”. It’s all big stick politics out there. It’s like trying to go after a corporation in the US. The “punishments” when they break the law are fines, if that, and any admonishment not to fuck over the same person in the same way again.

      Think about your boss shorting you $100. The “legal” process involves YEARS of waiting for a court date, a labor code interpreted heavily in favor of the employer, and at the end of the day, they get fines and maybe have to pay back what you rightfully earned in the first place.

      Now think about what happens when you steal $100 from work. Immediate police involvement, possible arrest, absolute legal consequences even if you’re cleared years later, the presumption of guilt from everyone in society.

      It’s even worse on a political stage. Nobody has the moral fortitude to step forward and fix shit because it’s broken. Everyone just waits around until the collective consciousness supports some sort of social consequence on the offender in question. That’s not even tying race or religion into the mix, which Israel loves to twist up into their particular brand of nationalism.

      The civil world is simply too polite to call them out for all their shit. It’s a whole world full of chickenshit and I am tired of the stink.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        It’s like that saying goes: “The law is the same for everyone, neither the king nor the beggar may sleep under a bridge.”

        • Ironfist79@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          That’s BS. The king would never need to sleep under a bridge and if he chose to the police would be there to kick out the homeless people and make sure the king is safe for the night.

          • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            That’s the point of the saying. The law can be crafted to treat everyone equally, while only benefitting the king.

            Edit: It’s why the billionaire media is so angry at the concept of “equity” and “wokeness”. Both terms help us beggars discuss our situation, and both might threaten the king’s throne, if we realize how simply the laws could be adjusted for what we want from them, rather than for what the king wants.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      There’s a rules-based international order. We make the rules, and guess who gives the orders.

    • Triasha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      You have been playing too much rainbow six. There are no good guys in the halls of power looking after us.

      There are only the rich fucks over here and the rich fucks over there pulling the levers of power.

    • MNByChoice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      Nation level retaliation would ensue. Maybe possible to do in some country matchups, but not possible in all.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      This isn’t how anything works. No government cedes this kind of authority to anyone and trying to enforce it would lead to war even among allies.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      28 days ago

      Trying to give Iran nukes is pretty close to accompliss to mass murder. Iran is a terrorist state.

      Anyone should reasonably be trying to negotiate to avoid loss of life but at the end of the day killing them may be the lesser of two evils from the perspective of the would be target.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    29 days ago

    They are flying jets, using drones, and even small explosives. The homes of these scientists were severely damaged. The richest countries of the world are backing Israel.

    Is this just Israel putting out propaganda? These scientists thought they were safe at home. Sinister! Super secret weapon that blows up apartment buildings. Sounds revolutionary!

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      As usual this is teenage boy logic. They are posing with their guns as recruitment propaganda. No it’s a super secret magic cool gun from god you haven’t even heard of it because it’s so futuristic and we’re cool so not at all evil, right

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It’s not normal. It’s ok until the majority of America accepts what can really be done with that database Trump is having Palantir build.

    • doctortofu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      It’s absolutely not okay, but since there will be no negative consequences for it whatsoever, it’s the new normal. This is sadly what happens when laws are not enforced, and I’m not sure if anything even can be done anymore…

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      they have been doing this for decades, even to the point clandestine type novel stories are often written about them.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      It is “statistically” normal in that governments and corporations will always choose death because it is profitable.

      It is not and never has been ok.

    • PlagueShip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      29 days ago

      It should be normal. People helping an evil state get nukes, deserve to die. Unfortunately what’s normal nowadays is sitting around fat and lazy and letting NK become a nuclear power.

        • PlagueShip@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Well they were less evil back then… now I think we should cut off all support. And I think we probably would stop the donations, if it wasn’t for Iran being allied with Ruzzia.

    • rhvg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      29 days ago

      Europeans did the genocide and took over America, in a much larger scale. Israel is just a smaller copy cat. The fact USA exists justifies what Israel does.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago
    1. what a stupid fucking name
    2. why does Israel get to have nuclear weapons
    3. why does no one ask question 2
      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        28 days ago

        Why not?

        Daily on Lemmy there are thousands of calls to murder X or Y person who doesn’t agree with collectivist ideology.

        Why would it be different for them?

          • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            28 days ago

            Sure, just check the modlog, there is thousands of murder calls and violent action calls erased everyday. That’s the ones that get reported.

            I feel comfortable saying no one here is surprised in the slightest by the level of violent discourse shared in here on Lemmy

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Because lemmings that try doing it would be pulled in front of a judge if they went public about it afterwards. It would a) just be a single person that would b) face consequences for that action.

          Israel on the other hand is a state level actor killing civilians in another jurisdiction. I know it’s just another war crime between many others at this point, but it bears noticing just how little the consequences have become

      • pineapplepizza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        In 1994, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia.

          • Makhno@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            Yeah, seems like the lesson is build nukes at all costs, as it’s the only safeguard against attack.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Typically, no one wants to die for stupid shit, especially when they are in the wrong. But when there is no consequences such as dying, a.k.a no nukes, why not go to war and take everything? There’s no morals between countries…unless enforced by nukes.

          This is why I’m pro nuclear armament of all countries.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        yeah but if Israel gets them the countries they keep bombing should also get to have them. the country that jerks off to 2A somehow doesn’t think so.

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          USA is at the core of the Western-Imperialist hedgemony & Israel, Japan & Pakistan gets to have them because they are Pro-Western imperialism

          • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Japan doesn’t have nukes though. They don’t even allow nukes in their territory. They could make them if they wanted to, they have all the necessary industry to make them, but they don’t actually have any.

            There’s word of sharing nukes with the US, thanks to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and threatening to nuke any nation that tries to help them, but I’m not sure that’s actually gone ahead.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            yes. the fact that Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons and Israel and the US still went after then is proof that they should have had nuclear weapons. because guess what would happen if they did. Israel would have stayed the fuck away.

            • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              28 days ago

              Clearly not working, Israel and the us have them nukes and that’s not stopping Iran and Palestine from retaliation

              Or do you see them staying the fuck away?

              Because I certainly don’t

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                28 days ago

                lol what. yeah the parties that don’t have the nukes do retaliate when the parties with the nukes are the aggressors. Iran didn’t start a war. Palestine isn’t even involved in a war that’s just genocide.

                • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  You are clearly seeing having nukes has no effect on retaliation, so why would you insist on it?

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          28 days ago

          Iran is a terrorist state run by lunatics. Them and Israel having them is even worse than Israel having them.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            weird how Israel is the one that keeps invading other countries, not to mention terrorizing palestine for its entire existence.

    • allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      29 days ago

      Unfortunately the answer is pretty simple. The USA and Israel are best buddies and if the USA says their buddy can have a nuclear arsenal who is going to stand up and tell them otherwise?

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    29 days ago

    Israel had been tracking Iranian nuclear scientists for years and the ten killed last week were marked for assassination in November of last year, Channel 12 says.

    This bit stood out to me. Israel has been planning this war since at least November of last year. Israel’s current actions say this wasn’t a simple “what if…” contingency plan that a government comes up with. This was a plan they were going to put into action soon. Makes it even more disgusting to me.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      This was clear since such a big and supposedly effective intelligence apparatus failed to stop or warn about the Hamas attack that gave Israel pretext to go full ethnic cleaning and warmongering.

      They knew, they allowed it, and paid a modest price in Israeli casualties to kickstart their plan. Also, Ukraine was attracting all the war funding, they couldn’t risk USA reducing their military allowance.

      I hate that USA is enabling them, and at the same time being hipocritical about wanting a peaceful solution. Cut their funding if you want to stop them. Freeze their assets like NATO did with Russia. Act, don’t talk.

      • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        It would take one phone call from the President, and the genocide would stop. Biden could have done it, and Trump still can. I don’t see the US governments unwavering support of Israel ever ending.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            29 days ago

            You’ll need to elaborate if you want to actually contribute.

            • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              29 days ago

              The president of the US doesn’t have their hand up the PM of Israel’s ass. This is especially true of Biden who was known to be on his way out either way. We can withdraw support but its difficult for the US pres to do so unilaterally when Israel is politically popular on both side. Given the lack of power to make it stick such a phone call from Biden would have been ignored in favor of waiting for a change of regime.

          • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            I don’t see how that is naive at all. We prop Israel up. If the president calls Bibi and threatens to stop all aid, unless they imposed a ceasefire, it would happen. They have so much power, tech and weaponry because we give it to them. If we pointed the barrel of the most powerful military on earth at them, they would cease immediately.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I hate that USA is enabling them,

        USA is just as guilty as the genocidal cult, perhaps even more so. Somehow I have more sympathy for the brainwashed than the profiteering.

      • rumimevlevi@lemmings.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        There we again with the israel has superior inteligence that can’t never make mistakes bs.

        Israel has many impressive operations but it doesn’t mean everything bad happen in israel is just according to a plan

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      Fuck, also explains why Netenyahu jumped at the opportunity as soon as he avoided having his government dissolved by vote. Fuuuuck this is so much evil bullshit.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        I strongly recommend you to listen to Ilan Pappe. He describes well how Israels society has deep internal rifts as the narrative of Zionism ultimately failed to build a cohesive society.

        So ultimately Israel needs the eternal war for two main reasons:

        1. To keep the support by its western lapdogs up, by presenting itself as the eternal victim under war.
        2. To keep the internal pressure contained by the necessity to hold together because of war.

        See for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9rr3j7vZGo

      • TheLiveFive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yeah it’s not that Israel is planning this, it’s that this is the plan of Israel the whole thing is this plan.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      I mean, that’s not really surprising. Every military makes plans for any contingency, and Israel especially has always been paranoid about Iran’s nuclear programme, so of course they would make sure they’re tracking the scientists in case they needed to make a move.

      The disgusting part is them just pulling the trigger for political reasons instead of actual intelligence that indicates a breakout. And obviously killing civilians, which the scientists and their families are, but obviously Israel has shown in the past they don’t care about that.

    • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      November, you say? I wonder what happened in November that caused Netanyahu to be emboldened to the point of planning Iranian assassinations…

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      They have been bombing Iran for years, OC these lunatics had these plans already.

      • TheLiveFive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        I’m sure you still think it was a great thing we got to iraq before they set off those wmd’s

      • kcweller@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        It’s civilian scientists working on nuclear energy we are talking about.

        You’re part of the problem.

          • kcweller@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            I’m not saying they couldn’t be. I’m saying that the official body meant to oversee this has not yet put out proof that they are. So we can imagine all we want. If the professional independent watchdog that is checking for this has not officially made a statement with undeniable proof that they are, they aren’t.

            Who has more insight in the matter, you or the IAEA?

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          29 days ago

          It’s civilian scientists working on nuclear energy we are talking about.

          Is it though? What level of enrichment do they need for a nuclear energy program, and what level of enrichment were they at? I think it’s naive to say they weren’t working on a weapon.

          I’m not saying it justifies killing civilian scientists, but we ought to be honest about the why.

          • kcweller@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            Where is the evidence that they are working on a weapon? There are people getting murdered because people have become brainwashed enough to just assume Iran is working on a nukes.

            I’m just saying, killing civilians on the basis of assumption is a pretty terrorist move and feels very similar to how Iraq was bombed to hell by America. But hey, that’s just my 2 cents.

            • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              According to the IAEA, the Natanz site was producing uranium enriched to 60% u-235.

              For electricity, you need 3-5% u-235.

              That’s not an energy program, that’s a weapons program.

              • kcweller@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                29 days ago

                And it’s on the IAEA to declare that they are indeed working on a weapons program, not speculation and assumption like yours.

                • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  And it’s on the IAEA to declare that they are indeed working on a weapons program, not speculation and assumption like yours.

                  Okay. Don’t use your reason if you’d prefer not to. It does make me wonder though:

                  Do you think the killing of the civilian scientists was wrong because they were civilian scientists, or because they were ostensibly working on an energy program?

                  Because as I said, I’m not claiming the murders were justified, just that we ought to be honest about the why.

                  There are plenty making the argument that Iran needs a nuclear weapons program to prevent exactly these types of attacks. That is intellectually honest. I’m not sure where I fall on that argument, I’d rather no one have nuclear weapons (but obviously that’s not going to happen).

                  The difference between 5% and 60% enrichment is pretty huge. And the research and effort required to get there is neither cheap nor easy. If what they’re after is nuclear energy, there is absolutely no reason to continue risking the ire of the international community and the repeated attacks by Israel. They’ve had energy-level uranium for a very long time already.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Iran has the right to defend themselves and israel has proven again that Iran is in need of this defense.

        • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          iran shouldn’t have funded hamas and terrorist activity around the world. Iran fucked around and now its finding out.

            • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              the terrorist state that launched a war against real terrorists after they murdered over 1200 people and took hundreds of people including children hostage.

              your REAL terrorist propaganda doesn’t work on me. blocked.

  • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Yet they didn’t know about preparation for the October 7th attack?

    Tinfoil hat mode: they let it happen to have a reason to raze Gaza to the ground.

    (Sorry, that’s my “Bush did 9/11” moment)

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is state sanctioned mass murder. This is state terror attacks across a national border. This is so unethical and obviously illegal, I don’t know what else to say about it.

    We need to distance ourselves from Israel. We need to stop giving them weapons. Right now, the taxes I pay go partially to arming them, I am partially responsible, and this is not “ok”. I do not want to be doing this, I never wanted this…

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      29 days ago

      Right now, the taxes I pay go partially to arming them,

      And we are giving millions in contracts to Palantir to help them create these nightmare AI projects with zero oversight.

      Alex Karp’s biography makes it pretty clear he’s trying to spin this shit as every American’s patriotic duty to support, and no different than the Manhattan project (as if that’s something great to aspire to in the first fucking place) during WWII.

    • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Just to play devils advocate, what circumstances is it legitimate for Israel to attack Iran?

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yeah, that’s cool.

        Well I guess my opinion is that it’s essentially never “legitimate” to be the aggressor. Determining which party is the aggressor can sometimes be complicated, but it often boils down to this: which party is crossing the border?

        In this case, I’m sure many would say that Iran took the first aggressive action by pursuing a nuclear program, but I have a few issues with that. First, Israel already has nuclear weapons, so surely that is an earlier provocation. Secondly, Iran still isn’t crossing the border, Israel was first to pull the trigger, and they pulled a lot of triggers (in Iranian territory). And finally, Israel and Iran have been in the process of forging nuclear treaties many times now, and nearly every time Israel has sabotaged the talks with provocative, often military actions, or they simply left the table - it seems clear to me that Israel does not want a nuclear deal, they will not accept any kind of compromise.

        • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          28 days ago

          If that’s your metric, then I think Israel meets it. Iran has sponsored and directed non-state actors in Israel. These include both Hamas and Hezbollah. Additionally, Houthi militants have targeted Israeli civilian shipping.

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            If a state is to be held accountable for non-state actors then I do not believe Israel or the United States has any moral high ground whatsoever. Even less than if we strictly limit the scope to only state actions.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            So Israel subjugates, kicks people from their homes, and guns them down en mass at peaceful protests for years. Then Hamas lashes back out in what we call a terrorist attack. Then Israel uses it as a reason to further their subjugation and commit genocide. The Houthis say they will shoot at any countrys ships who is trading with Israel unless they stop their massacre. And you’re saying that it would have been a better response for Iran to just bomb Israel without notice. Maybe you’re right. Most of the world should have done something to stop what Israel was doing, but most of it was about putting pressure on the U.S. to say this isn’t worth us spending money on, and convince us to tell Israel to stop or we’d cut aid and sanction them. If Iran attacked in defense of the Palestinians, Israel would once again have made it out that they were somehow the victim. They aren’t. The only reason the “2 state solution” never came to be is because Israel made sure it would never happen.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      state terror

      Yeah, the ‘protocols of the elders of zion’ larpers dont do anything else

      need to stop

      I think it’s a few years late for purely negative action to be useful here.

      We let this get too far out of hand. The question is: glass some LARPers, or world war 3? If the former is not on the table, the latter is inevitable.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I think it’s a few years late for purely negative action to be useful here.

        I actually disagree with that. If we end the flow of weapons and funding to Israel, we’d see a totally different behavior from Israel within the week.

        The question is: glass some LARPers, or world war 3? If the former is not on the table, the latter is inevitable.

        And this part, you’re saying nuke them or else WW3? That rhetoric is as bad as theirs! If you can’t think of any other solutions, then please, don’t be part of the solution.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    29 days ago

    Few things say “you need a nuke, you need it right now” like foreign states killing your scientists, in their beds in the dead of night

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        29 days ago

        I don’t agree with Israel at all. But Iran is a theocratic ethnostate as well. One that has pretty loudly proclaimed that the day they have nuclear weapons is the day before they use one on Israel. There’s nobody out there who’s in a morally high position.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          No Iran definitely has the moral high ground, by a fair margin. Israel has been committing a genocide, as well as running a full on apartheid ethnostate, if you didn’t know. But even if we ignore that, the IAEA as wel as the American intelligence community (think NSA, CIA and so on) have both assessed, as recently as a week ago, that Iran has not attempted to build nuclear weapons since 2003. Iran is being bombed, illegally, based on a lie. That’s high ground enough for me.

          • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            No, Iran is definitely not on any sort of moral high ground. They and Israel are so deep underground they’re communicating with the mole people.

            • wpb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              I think you stronly underestimate how bad genocide is. Are you a history buff? In the 20th century there was this guy called Hitler. He became the personification of evil because he committed genocide. That’s where Israel is at. Iran, as far as I know, is not committing a genocide.

              • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                I don’t think you give a shit about genocide, personally, you’ve just picked the Palestinian Genocide as your particular favourite issue to bang your drum about.

                Tell me, what are your opinions on:

                • The Ukrainian Genocide (by Russia)
                • The Masalit Genocide (by Sudan)
                • The Rohingya Genocide (by Myanmar)
                • The Uyghur Genocide (by China) ?

                And those are the other genocides happening literally right now!

                Let’s go a little further back:

                • The Tigray Genocide (by Ethiopia in 2022)
                • The Yazidi Genocide (by ISIS in 2014)
                • The Darfur Genocide (By the RSF in 2005)
                • The Bosnian Genocide (by Serbia in 1995)
                • The Death Commissions (by Iran from 1981-1988. Ebrahim Raisi, President of Iran until 2024 was literally on the panels that executed people for being non-Muslim!)
                • The Kurdish Genocide (by Iraq in 1988 and arguably by Turkey and Iran now, given that pro-Iran protestors set fire to the Kurdish party offices in Iraq)

                So no, I don’t think you care. If you did, you wouldn’t be supporting Iran who gives drones to Russia to commit genocide and have themselves committed genocide. You would be calling for Iran’s government to be deposed for the religious nutjobs that they are.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            28 days ago

            They can stop enrichment of uranium any time it’s not even the only choice for nuclear power and they long surpassed the target they need to generate power. They ARE trying for nukes just aren’t close due to first negotiations then sabatogue and murders.

            • wpb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              28 days ago

              They ARE trying for nukes

              What do you know that the IAEA, the NSA, the CIA, the FBI, and the rest of the entire American intelligence community don’t? What an unbelievably arrogant way to fall for the exact same lie that they used for the illegal invasion of Iraq and all the war crimes that ensued.

        • ronanfahy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          Theocracy maybe, but I definitely wouldn’t consider Iran an ethnostate

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            29 days ago

            Theocracy yes, almost as badly as the zionists. Ethnostate no. You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about, hazbarite.

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              29 days ago

              When was the last time Iran invaded land to settle it with its own people?

              • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                29 days ago

                Yes, because iran is as bad in one single way as the zionists, they’re also as bad in all the other ways.

                Like how im a really shitty painter, so therefore im exactly as bad as hitler in everything.

                Im glad you understood precisely what i was saying there. Really helps my faith in humanity.

                • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  Like how im a really shitty painter, so therefore im exactly as bad as hitler in everything.

                  If you say so.

              • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                28 days ago

                I think their last offensive war was tge 1700s? Since then it appears they have been mostly playing the soft power war by proxy game. While their main antagonists actively invade, infiltrate and kill them.

                I can’t personnally get over the facts that invaders overthrew their democracy because of fucking oil.

                The perpetrators should nuke themselves out of shane. Their intelligence agents should auto-trotsky themselves.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          29 days ago

          If I learned anything from the 2024 election it’s that we must unequivocally support the lesser evil. Since Israel attacked first (and is actively committing genocide), that means Iran is the lesser evil and therefore they are perfect and not supporting them means you support genocide. /s

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        The other is the world’s biggest bully and largest exporter of “freedom”, as seen in Lybia, Iraq and even Iran back in the 1950s

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    10 assassinations of relatively innocent people simultaneously. Straight out of Walter white’s playbook when he went full villain.

  • Navarian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    Let me fix the headline - Israel commits more state sponsored terrorist attacks in neighbouring countries.

  • carlossurf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Jesus they killed everyone in the apartment complex including their kids how is this not a war crime?!?

  • Stamets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    The only difference between Israel and a terrorist organization is PR and budget.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It got more legal a few years ago, I think. Not explicitly “made legal”, but the legal foundations have been eroded. I.e. if you can expect to get away with something it is legal in a very real sense.

      It’s always been practically legal for empires like the US, Russia, China to commit any atrocities in weak countries, More and more countries are seeing how much they can get away with.

      Netanyahu tested the limits over and over and saw there were really quite few legal limits. With Gaza, he saw the limits didn’t actually exist at all.

          • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            I think it’s probably pretty hard to keep simultaneously assassinating 10 targets and their families under wraps, so they’re trying to get ahead of accusations by pretending it’s a show of military strength instead of horrifying skynet murder.

            It looks especially bad when they’re pointing the finger at Iran for fucking cluster bombs.

            The argument being cluster bombs are a dirty move, but using simultaneous AI powered assassin drones to strike while people are sleeping makes you the good guys?

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              The argument being cluster bombs are a dirty move, but using simultaneous AI powered assassin drones to strike while people are sleeping makes you the good guys?

              I mean… That is how this works. Cluster bombs are bad because they’re less precise and cause more collateral damage. So weapons that target individuals with high precision are better

              But like… Presumably, you’re not just individually killing a bunch of civilians precisely

              • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                29 days ago

                But like… Presumably, you’re not just individually killing a bunch of civilians precisely

                No, they’re not precise at all unless you consider also killing their families and potentially an entire building full of people to be acceptable “precision.”

                That’s why it seems like bullshit to pretend lower tech cluster bombs are an inexcusable evil compared to Palantir AI drones.

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  But that’s it exactly - cluster bombs just fling granades all over a city block at random. It’s basically just collateral damage in the hopes of hitting a soft target

                  I mean, fuck palantir and I really don’t like this tech in general, but blowing up a room or a house is way more precise. You’re hitting just what you mean to hit

                  And that’s what a lot of war crimes come down to - certain weapons are unacceptably imprecise. Which gets into the first rule of war crimes - you’re not supposed to attack noncombatants

                  Let’s not defend cluster bombs just because Israel is going to use this for justification…

                  Because of course they will, this whole thing started by blowing up the Iranian negotiator, they’re obviously not going to start acting in good faith now

                • MangoCats@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  they’re not precise at all unless you consider also killing their families and potentially an entire building full of people to be acceptable “precision.”

                  No matter where you are on the scale, you could always get better (just killing the intended target) and worse (low yield nuke somewhere near the building.)

                  The saddest part is when they calculate that the collateral damage is “beneficial” to their cause. That’s the kind of calculation that tends to become more and more inaccurate over the long term.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        I have mixed feelings - Gaza clearly shows a “worse way” to do warfare, but that doesn’t move the needle on how bad it is to say: “Welp, there’s a 90% chance that somewhere in this building is somebody associated with a group that we don’t like, so take it down tonight while everyone is home sleeping.”

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          29 days ago

          The thing is, until someone actually faces any consequences in modern times for atrocities such as these; simply saying how bad they are has become meaningless.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            29 days ago

            It isn’t meaningless.

            It is not enough in itself and being like “well i said it, now all is done from my side” is problematic.

            Still it is important to call it out as a mean to pressure those with direct power to enact consequences to do so.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            Saying it’s bad is a step better than saying nothing, which is a step better than parroting the speeches provided by Great Leader’s party promoters.

    • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      Civilian nuclear scientists working in enrichment are not protected by the Geneva convention. Technically it is legal to kill them when engaged in warfare.

      • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Has Israel officially declared war on Iran? Apart from that, why aren’t they protected by the Geneva convention?

        • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          28 days ago

          An official declaration of war is not required. These nuclear scientists are not protected by the Geneva convention because Iranian nuclear infrastructure, including persons, are military targets. The purpose is to destroy Iran’s nuclear capacity and that’s a purposeful military objective.

          • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            28 days ago

            That sounds like total bullshit, according to that logic anything could be declared a military target and therefore nothing would fall under the Geneva convention. I think you’re talking out of your ass.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    What is to stop the ultra wealthy from simply each making a million of these AI commanded drones, and just…killing all the poor? ALL of them? ALL OF US?!

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      because the ultra wealthy can’t cook, can’t produce the stuff needed to cook, can’t build super cars or private jets or build mansions, they can’t make the latest high tech gadgets, they can’t produce the most stylish of clothes or expensive watches. That’s why they keep us around. They need us plebs to make them stuff and produce their wealth to purchase the shit we make.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        This why they are so obsessed with AI. When AI can do whatever they want, the rest of us will be exterminated like pests.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          28 days ago

          Who would’ve guessed skynet was purposefully created by the wealthy back when T2 came out amongst us general public?

          I was like, “oh that’s so eerie” as a youngster. The truth behind this path has, unfortunately, been both more embarrassing and savage.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      28 days ago

      The rich are only rich because the money they possess can be exchanged directly or indirectly for people’s labour. Without it, the money is valueless and the rich cease to be. It’s also one reason why labour strikes are so effective and the rich have had to create militias to prevent them.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        You miss the point. If they get AI to the point where it can replicate our work “well enough”, it won’t need to even be intelligent or invent new things.

        They won’t need to care about money, if they get to the point where AI produces and maintains everything for them.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          I understand completely what you’re saying and I have considered it. I just don’t believe we’ll ever get to the point where a fully automated system produces all necessary goods for high standard of living without human labour required. Worse, even if we get to the point where significantly less labour is required, history informs us that the unemployed would very likely revolt and take power through violence. Especially because we won’t be able to go from the status quo to a state where we neutralize revolting people automatically in a short enough time frame for people to be caught by surprise and unable to revolt. Not to mention that a part of such a revolt would likely include the stoppage of work by people who work on, maintain and operate the automation. I think the most likely scenario as we go down this path would be the formation of militant labour unions that take power back from the rich and steer automation into producing for the majority. Whether we go away from capitalism through this change or reshape it, I don’t have a guess.

    • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      29 days ago

      The ratio of poor to ultra wealthy is far greater than a million to one. Other than that, the only practical reason they have for not doing it is that they still need human labor for most of what they do. That isn’t going to change anytime soon, despite AI. However, they don’t need their labor force to be free or happy, which is why the US is on the cusp of a fascist takeover.

      The rule of law has largely stopped mattering to the ultra wealthy. It may occasionally inconvenience them, but they know it will never affect them in any personal way.

      Not all of the ultra wealthy are socipaths. Unfortunately, terminal-stage capitalism does a surprisingly good job of selecting for sociopathy at the very top of the hierarchy. Becoming that rich requires both a strong belief that you deserve it and a disregard for how acquiring it harms others.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        One weird thing I noticed is the children inheriting the welth also tend to be psycho. Perhaps having everything you need destroys empathy?

        • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          That is a good point. I think you’re right that being raised in an entitled environment by a socipathic parent brings out the worst in people. It also selects for the worst child being the one who wins the fight to take over the business.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Yeah that’s why collectivists worldwide always strive to think for you what you need, and taking the standard of living to the lowest possible level, that’s way no one can have have what they need, except obviously the ones in power, ideologically speaking

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      28 days ago

      Because drones are expensive, and it would be a waste of money to use them on poor people.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Why would anyone do this? Why wouldn’t the normal legal process supported by all the rest of the rich bozos stop the one Uber rich psycho.

      Why would anyone not notice a million terminators being made before they were unleashed?

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yeah, if it wasn’t only because people in here love that type of “sarcastic” comments

          I mean 26 upvotes for a clearly deranged idea?

          Jeezus

    • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      Then who would they lord over and whose hard work would they make their money off of, on the other hand using these threats to bring back slavery feels like the scarier future to me

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        We in the USA are telling farmers that they won’t deport their labor if they are accountable to them. They can very easily have those who defect or resist in any way deported to concentration camps. They can also be imprisoned for trying to slip over the border the other way.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Pretty much this and the answer is nothing. This is the world we have created where people are murdered just because. We are the ultimate terrorist.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      28 days ago

      Are you just like that by default or are you just missing your daily pills?

      Maybe stop projecting your inner traumas towards the world, and get help. Can’t be possible to live a healthy life with that mindset