- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Yes, but bad example pics are used bcs the right panel example is also built by humans and is very efficient for the intent.
So both pics are great examples for the left panel - the AI would produce a clusterfuck of convoluted multilevel railways that would never see irl implementations in the railway business.
Whenever i ser apps built with ai assitance i just think:“wait until an exploit pops up and no one knows how to fix it. Since it was hallucinated by ai from 2009 code”
sometimes it feels like they’re doing it on purpose.
yesterday, i asked for it to create a basic rest api authentication function/method and it gave me something back that explicitly disabled ssl and when i asked why; it simply said “oops”.
i like the idea that AI is actually competent enough to insert exploits
i think its dumb enough to put exploits in because someone on stackexchange thought it made it more difficult 9 years ago.
