Excited to find the western chauvinists in this community.
Edit: Wow apparently the only people on chapo dot chat are whitees unaffected by and benefiting from their imperialism confidently declaring how the perpetrators are to be treated.
Y’all have some nerve
Edit 2:
ITT If you shoot a black kid in the back in downtown Baltimore I want nothing to do with you. If you perfarate an entire back family in Mogadischu or Baghdad that’s ok, you did growth and spaces.
Communism is when you declare individual moral culpability for their role as cogs in an oppressive machine and the more you declare it the more communister it is. In fact, Marxism is 100% about the moral veracity of individual actions. That’s why Engels was an evil counterrevolutionary for continuing to manage a factory his father owned despite claiming to be a “”“Communist”“” and Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai were reactionaries since they are products of the exploitative Chinese landowning class.
You dumb fuck. Can you read? Where is the talk of “counterrevolutionary” or “reactionaries”. Engels, Mao and Enlai wouldn’t fly into mad rage like you if someone insulted them for being landlords or capitalist. They’d probably join in.
Lol literally all of my comments have been sarcastic, why do you think I’m raging? I’m not a troop, never have been one and never will be one and I’ve even cucked troops on more than one occasion lol. I just think it’s funny as fuck that people on twitter dot com love stirring the pot and think making moral judgements is praxis.
Answer my question, what is the goal of a left wing movement in your mind?
Answer my question, what is the goal of a left wing movement in your mind?
I’m not taking the bait. If you have something to say say it.
I mean I can’t respond to you unless you tell me what the goal of a left wing movement is, and how you think it can be achieved. Otherwise I can only assume you don’t care about the end result and only the moral purity of the movement itself
The achievement of the “left’s” goals will not depend on the feelings of people who apparently are so mentally deficient as to not be able to engage in any demanding activity while stroking their dick up and down. Your view of veterans is much more of an impediment than any insult hurled at them for their service. They are either big boys and will get over it or they are not and you wouldn’t want them near any kind of firearm.
I mean I only care about people’s feelings insofar as they affect material results. I don’t think there will be a revolution any time soon but the obsession with moral atonement like “”“”““leftism””“”“” is a religion is entirely counterproductive. The demand for self-flagellation among former troops is part of a broader trend on the western left, which in it’s impotence has latched onto moralizing as it’s primary focus. I don’t think that spending years investing time in disparaging and admonishing troops is going to end well when the time comes. We don’t live in a place and time where angry masses with semi auto rifles can take on the largest and most technologically advanced military in the world. It wouldn’t be like Vietnam or Afghanistan, it would be a conflict of life and death for the Imperialist forces and they would treat it as such. Revolution in the imperial core would necessitate major defections from Imperialist security forces, most likely from those that are colonized people themselves.
People forget that one of original lines of the Internationale were “Our bullets are for our own generals”
EDIT: You know what, no, that’s not the post. Does anyone remember who the most effective activists against the Vietnam War. The Vietnam Veterans Against War. The conservatives literally had to concoct a mythology that anti-war activists fucking hated the troops to the point that they spit on returning veterans.
Bourgeois professional militaries literally have their own inherent class divide in officers vs enlisted.
The entire reason historical wars became so unpopular was because of drafts and conscription, which is inherently polarizing due to affecting different segments of society unequally based on class. Conscripted armies are literally a means of socialization and consciousness-forming for the working class in the exact same way concentrated industrial enterprises are. Conscript armies become pressure cookers for class-based social unrest and dissent. This is precisely the reason they abolished the draft after Vietnam and will never actually reinstitute it. Just like police, professional volunteer-only militaries inevitably become hotbeds of reaction and hubs for reactionary indoctrination, pitting the professional soldiers and professional cops against cowardly, soft “civilians”.
I occasionally see posts from here with army recruiters sending texts to schoolkids and the weird troop worship you have.
If I’d grown up as skint and fucked up as I was in the UK at 16 in the US instead with your lack of healthcare and in a really shit environment I would have taken the first genuine shot of escaping I could.
That would probably have been the army tbh.
Should we be so accepting of IDF veterans fresh from shooting civvies on the border fence?
I dunno. I guess only if said veteran was fully repentant and acknowledging of the crimes they were part of…and most importantly were now actively agitating against them.
I guess I don’t believe in condemning people forever - neither the cop in Baltimore nor the grunt in Mogadishu, if they’re on the bottom rungs of such fucked up hierarchies. We need allies and if they’ve come around, that’s better than nothing.
Forgive, never forget.
This is true, but that’s wholly distinct from pulling our punches on troops out of the desire to attract them to the left, which seems to be the stance a lot of people take
I don’t know if it is a great strategy to antagonize everyone with actual military training, for the sake of “not forgiving” them.
Sorry sweaty L E F T I S M is about guilt and innocence, not about achieving material goals
Not directly about this particular struggle session, but just throwing this out there because it’s relevant:
There are various groups that help soldiers leave the military by offering legal or other counseling (like mental health), and by sometimes offering legal representation. This is a big deal, since it allows troops to leave the service usually without getting screwed by their command and getting a negative discharge that will negatively effect them throughout the rest of their lives. I know some veterans anti-war groups do things like this, and the GI Rights Hotline also offers a lot of resources for general navigation of the military legal system.
If the left really organized behind this in some form, they could remove soldiers from the ranks by helping them get themselves kicked out, while also providing a pipeline to bring them leftward. Not a whole lot of people are aware of this kind of thing, so I thought it was worth mentioning as potential praxis.
So here’s a question: There are vets in our ranks, is this good or bad?
Good
Okay, struggle session over!
I’m perpetually fascinated by people here who tout ACAB while also twisting themselves into pretzels to excuse soldiers. I guess being complicit in a system that terrorizes the poor, minorities, and marginalized groups while acting as armed forces of capital is bad on US soil, but excusable overseas? Am I understanding this right?
That would only be a fair comparison with veterans and ex-cops.
And be honest, how likely is it that an ex-cop has actually reformed?The only ex-cops that I might trust are those that quit as whistle-blowers; or that were minorities policing minority neighborhoods in attempts at harm reduction or something like that.
Does anyone have real problems with ex-cops who have cut ties with cop culture? The problem with that DSA guy was that he was still organizing cop unions and apologizing for cops.
Yeah, that’s all I’m really commenting on here. This site seems to reject cops pretty quickly but puts a lot of effort into embracing vets and I’m asking what real difference is between the two groups, outside of average age
One difference is the people they’re trained to oppress.
Cops are trained to oppress their own countrymen. Soldiers are trained to oppress people on the other side of the world.
It’s why in revolutions we see the military flip long before cops do. Cops are always the last holdouts.
1.) Cops can quit
2.) Cops are a completely separate class of petty landless warriors who are distinct from American society. They have class interests that differ from both the working class and bourgeois due to their unique position as the only habitually armed class in society.
3.) Vets are almost all working class upon leaving the military.
We’re talking about people who used to be soldiers.
I understand that?
ACAB applies to people who are currently cops, if they are “good” and quit, then they are no longer cops.
Hmm. Personally I don’t even agree with that statement, but wouldn’t it be more apt to compare vets to cops that have retired and taken a pension and shit? Like most soldiers don’t quit, their contract ends. Does ACAB not apply to retired cops?
I’m trying to have a good faith talk here
I don’t necessarily agree either, just trying to clarify the position.
Current cops -> bad (no real way to become “good”)
resigned cops who become good one way or another -> mostly goodactive duty soldiers -> bad?
veterans who become good later -> whatever this thread decides, ig
deleted by creator
we are all victims of our circumstances. if you repent and grow to understand what you did then there’s no need to inflict further pain on you.
Lemmie dunk on any leftist who joined the army when there was virtually no left in america and it can be argued there’s still no left now.
Left Twitter is so bad right now. Bernie was the only thing uniting us.
Certain segments of left Twitter was too okay with bipolars and other people with mental and emotional issues dictate the conversation. No offence to those dealing with such shit but their emotional volitility and blatant uncoolness prevents anyone from seeing the far left as anything besides a pack of diseased LARPers crying about their lack of popularity inbetween the 80th party split that day
yikes
Bad post. You don’t have to have mental issues to be an asshole. And many people with mental issues aren’t assholes. Saying “no offense” doesn’t excuse stuff that is needlessly offensive.
Hi I’m bipolar fuck Yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooou
Exhibit A has arrived I see
bigotry against people with mental health issues by accusing everyone whose takes you don’t like of being mentally ill is good and helpful and will advance the cause of bringing justice to the world.
banned
lmao owned
:crab-party:
Bruh
The Bolsheviks took power on the backs of soldiers in the imperialist Russian army. Soldiers are not some special section of the working class that gets to decide to just not work, we accept that workers are essentially forced to work for bosses under capitalism, that’s why we don’t let capitalists get away with the “just get another job if your boss is bad” argument, it is a matter of life and death. These people made a terrible decision just as they got out of high school, they fought or served for the fascist army of the US, regardless of what they did or didn’t do they objectively were on the wrong side of any war they fought in. They have to live with that for the rest of their lives but the fact is they’re here now, they’re in our country and members of our class with the same fundamental interests as us, this isn’t even mentioning the overrepresentation of colonized people in the army. We can talk about some moral reckoning where we ask them to wear a dunce cap and self crit after we’ve actually had a revolution. At the end of the day, we aren’t fighting people, we’re fighting systems, I don’t think we should go out and attack Lee Carter or Spencer Rapone or Mike Prysner just because they joined the army if they acknowledge that imperialism is something we have to struggle against.
Would you do the same to an ex-cop who shot an unarmed black man?
I didn’t say forgive war criminals. I’m talking about people haven’t committed war crimes and have spent the time after they finished their service working to oppose that system they upheld. Christopher Dorner was a veteran and a cop, I would gladly welcome him into any party.
I’m talking about people haven’t committed war crimes
Every troop who was in Iraq is a criminal. That pure vet who was in the army but didn’t contribute directly to US imperial violence is figment of your imagination.
Well now you’re moving the goalposts, you asked about a cop killing an unarmed black man and now you’re logically extending that to every single ex-cop, even paper pushers and IT guys. Were they complicit in a violent system? Yes. Is there an equivalent value between the guy who spent all his time repairing shit and guarding a base to the people working in Abu Ghraib? No.
You think all the vets you’ll get will be ones who haven’t shot a bullet? What do you do if you get a vet whose job it was to kick in Iraqi doors and arrest all the men? I’m giving you an easy one here, no killing.
You accuse me of moving the goalposts when I stead of answering my question you answered a different one about “vets who didn’t commit war crimes”. I only moved them after you went to a whole different field.
I wouldn’t even say don’t let people who have killed in, the basic line I think we should take is to look at it on a case by case basis. If they understand that what they did was wrong, they embrace marxism-leninism and they haven’t killed or tortured civilians we should let them in.
You started with “Should the cops who killed unarmed black men let into the party?” I responded with “no those who commit war crimes (implying that we shouldn’t let cops who murder unarmed black men or are complicit in that either) shouldn’t be let in.” You then said that “every troop in Iraq was a criminal” implying that all ex-cops shouldn’t be let in as well. If you make a comparison between cops and soldiers, follow through. You’re trying to get me to make your point for you by answering each question one at a time, just make your point.
Considering a popular sentiment in this thread is that we need troop help bc they “know how to fight”, how many skills the average US soldiers develops would actually be relevant to the resource scare guerilla war likely to happen in a revolution? As far as I know most grunts don’t get much tactics training and even those who do would be used to massive support infrastructures that revolutionaries obviously wouldn’t have.
Being paid to be in shape, being able to fire a gun, and having knowledge of effective command structures would all be useful af.
Anything on top of that is a bonus, and comes from specialisation. Bomb disposal very quickly can become bomb creation, etc.
I re-read the thing again
If you or someone you love has been war crimed you can yell at the troops
If you are performatively hand-wringing on behalf of an imaginary person you have created in your mind who has been war crimed please shut the fuck up.
“Advocacy and empathy regarding issues that do not personally affect you is bad, actually”
Are we talking about advocacy and empathy or are we talking about extremely online people trying to score points on twitter by being more woke than thou?
Contributing to orgs that actually do things is advocacy, listening to people who have experienced the sharp end of imperialism is empathy.
Deliberately poking a sleeping shark in the ass on twitter because you know it’ll do something exciting is neither of those.
