• birdcat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck, china is so brutal to just arrest people simply on the suspicion of illegally providing state secrets to foreign countries! What kind of country does that? 915 days now!

    … and the missing sunshine part really makes me wonder what those Uyghurs were missing during their time of imprisonment…

    • Edham Mamet: 2827 days
    • Arkin Mahmud: 2793 days
    • Ahmad Tourson: 2824 days
    • Abdul Razak: 3586 days
    • Hassan Anvar: 2818 days
    • Ahmed Adil: 1547 days
    • Yusef Abbas: 4204 days
    • Akhdar Qasem Basit: 1425 days
    • Bahtiyar Mahnut: 2791 days
    • Abdul Helil Mamut: 2558 days
    • Haji Mohammed: 1425 days
    • Saidullah Khalik: (data missing)
    • Abdul Ghappar: 2679 days
    • Hajiakbar Abdulghupur: (data missing)
    • Abu Bakr Qasim: 1425 days
    • Abdullah Abdulqadirakhun: 2558 days
    • Dawut Abdurehim: 2677 days
    • Adel Abdulhehim: 1425 days
    • Emam Abdulahat: 2558 days
    • Hozaifa Parhat: 2604 days
    • Hammad Memet: 3586 days
    • Adel Noori: 2706 days
        • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Prisons will still be necessary for the most egregious and irredeemable criminals. The sad reality is that there are certain people who simply need to be sequestered from the rest of society for the general public’s safety, and no amount of rehabilitation or intervention will solve that. But that should be the exception, not the norm. The massive prison population is absolutely a problem, but it isn’t something that can be completely abolished. It may be called something else in the future (like a long-term involuntary mental health facility,) but it’s still serving the same basic function while wearing a more friendly mask.

          • spectre [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It could be abolished in the sense that the “location where we keep the most irredeemable people in society, who absolutely can not be left unsupervised” may not be a “prison”, but some other secure facility that maximizes the ability of these people to make whatever contribution they may be able to make to society.

            • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              but some other secure facility that maximizes the ability of these people to make whatever contribution to society they may be able to make to society.

              Yeah, I touched on that with my last sentence:

              It may be called something else in the future (like a long-term involuntary mental health facility,) but it’s still serving the same basic function while wearing a more friendly mask.

              There are two problems with that. The first is that “maximizing contribution to society” can easily be interpreted as “being forced to stamp license plates for 16 hours a day.” We already know this is a possible interpretation, because that’s how our system already interprets it. Either way they’re locked up against their will, and are being forced to perform labor to someone else’s benefit. The very nature of their confinement means that any contribution they make will be for someone else and not themselves. And the simple word for that is “slavery”. The second problem is that it’s still prison. We haven’t actually solved the prison problem at all in this scenario; We’ve simply given it a mask so we can say prisons have been abolished. Like if we don’t call them prisons, we can say we don’t have any prisoners.